Tja...Waar ik woon is het nog dun gezaaid met bewustwording, in alle contreien op niveaus. (Oe als ik dit maar goed zeg.) Hoe dan ook, de reformwinkel is op maandag gesloten dus alleen de supermarkten.
Ik heb al een paar dagen pannekoeken gegeten, speltpannekoeken, van speltmeel dus. Verantwoord broodbeleg is ook minimaal hier, dus met jam en kaas..
Dus vandaag in de gewone supermarkt een biologisch brood gekocht. Dat staat er dan tralala op, maar de supermarkthouders weten wat ze doen Thuis op de ingrediëntenlijst gekeken. TARWEMEEL!!!
Dus ook als je een biologisch brood koopt, in de supermarkt, zit er dat witte meel in.
zondag 20 oktober 2019
Galactische updates Aardbewoners hebben een opfriscursus nodig van de wetten van God en de schepping
Deze Wetten zijn voortgebracht door Schepper God Aton of Light en The Creation en worden ook The Balans van Balansen genoemd. -
A. Het hoogste bevel van De scheppingswet is:
Behaal de wijsheid van kennis voor zover dit je in staat zal stellen om wijselijk de Wetten van de Schepping te volgen.
B. Het hoogste gebod van De wet van God is:
U zult God eren als de Heerser van de menselijke rassen en Zijn Wetten volgen want HIJ is de "Koning van Wijsheid".
We bereiken spirituele perfectie door te leren en wijselijk de Wetten te volgen die door God en de Schepping zijn gegeven. We leren door de Geest van God in ons hoe we in harmonie en balans met de hele schepping kunnen leven.
De wetten zijn als volgt:
1. U zult geen andere goden dan de Schepper-God voor u hebben en zich houden aan de Wetten van de Schepping die alles omvat. Ook bekend als de "Law of One".
2. Je zult voor jezelf geen afgoden en valse beelden maken om als goden te aanbidden, want daarin geef je macht in de handen van het kwaad.
3. Je zult de Heer God liefhebben met heel je hart, ziel en wezen (je moet jezelf liefhebben als God en God als jezelf).
4. U zult de naam van God niet oneerbiedig gebruiken, noch gebruiken om te zweren tot een leugen.
5. Denk aan Gods "dag" en houd het heilig. (Elke dag is een Gods "dag".)
6. U zult uw vader en moeder eren.
7. Je zult je medemens niet vermoorden. (Moorden om je leven of dat van je gezin te redden is geen moord)
8. U mag geen overspel plegen.
9. Je mag niet stelen (materieel of emotioneel).
10. Je moet niet begeren naar of jaloers zijn op dat wat van je naaste is.
11. Je moet je vrije wil niet opleggen of afdwingen aan de vrije wil van een ander. Ook bekend als 'De wet van niet-inmenging'.
12. Je moet anderen niet beoordelen (veroordelen), maar je moet wijselijk alle gedragingen en acties beoordelen die in strijd zijn met de Wetten van God en de Schepping.
13. Zoals u zaait, zult u oogsten. Ook wel "De wet van oorzaak en gevolg" genoemd.
14. U moet alle verplichtingen nakomen die zijn gedaan in dienst aan God, de Vader, de Ene binnenin.
15. U moet de wijsheid van God gehoorzamen voor de verantwoorde en evenwichtige voortplanting van uw soort.
16. Behandel anderen zoals u wilt dat zij u behandelen. Wordt ook "De Gouden Regel" genoemd.
17. Het kwaad (tegenstanders van God) moet altijd een teken van hun kwaadaardigheid dragen. (Aan hun vruchten zult u hen kennen).
18. Je moet geen slavernij (fysiek of emotioneel) plegen bij een mens van God Schepper.
Met de gemeenschap van de Geest van Leven in ons, moeten we eerst wijselijk de Wetten van Evenwicht begrijpen en volgen, en ten tweede moeten we wijselijk weten waar onze verantwoordelijkheid begint en eindigt binnen de Schepping op deze prachtige Planeet Aarde.
De eerste vraag die moet worden gesteld, is hoe kan ik mijn leven in "harmonie en evenwicht" houden met de rest van "schepping"? Het antwoord is, je begint met het pure verlangen om de waarheid te kennen. We moeten erkennen dat we beperkt zijn in onze waarneming van waarheid en dat God het beste pad voor ons kent om te reizen in zijn dienst. Dus moeten we dan onze "wil" (ego) overgeven aan dat wat Gods Wil is.
“In je dagelijkse gebed moet je God vragen om het liefdevolle Licht van bescherming, leiding, kracht, wijsheid, kennis, waarheid, integriteit en moed om zijn Wil het beste te dienen en niet jouw wil (ego)”.
Dan moeten we in onze rustige hoek mediteren. We moeten luisteren. We moeten wachten op onze Vader-God die in ons is (onze God-Geest) om ons te geven wat we nodig hebben om ons in zijn dienst te ondersteunen. Onze wil en zijn wil moeten weer één worden.
Wat gebeurt er op Epstein Island en elke andere rituele catacombe ... ? Word er gesmeerd met bruin slijmerig spul (goo)?
Luister naar Hatonn die de partij beschrijft die doorgaat met het duistere leiderschap. Voor velen is het een 'geen hersens' dat plaatsvindt op Epstein Island ... wat een chantagefabriek op hoog niveau blijkt te zijn die het erg druk had ... de vier satanische prinsen en hun volgelingen, bedekt met bruine goo ... het bruine goo ding vindt overal plaats ... in feite leiden de orgies van de dood ertoe dat mensen worden bedekt met een mix van stront, spuug, zweet, pis, bloed, sperma, vaginale afscheiding en menselijk vlees!
NIET VERTAALD: X22Report & Uncensored Headlines: The Panic Is Real, Middle East Plan Perfectly Executed, 17, Coincidence | [CB] up to Their Old Tricks, NP Exposed on the Economy | School Crossing Guard Is Latest Victim of ‘Red Flag’ Laws (Videos)
Thursday, October 17, Due Diligence
The [DS] panic is real, NP and CS freaked out in a meeting with Trump, stormed out. Sidney Powell pushes for the 2 JM phones. The middle east plan perfectly executed, peace is coming. The number 17, coincidence. Rep Cummings passed away. Patriots are in control. —
AND: BJ and the EU have made a deal for the BREXIT, the deal seems as though it is a duplicate of Theresa Mays deal, this is why the EU agreed. Nigel Farage says this is not a BREXIT deal. McConnell wants to know why Pelosi has not voted on the USMCA. The reason because she is following a different agenda. Blue collar workers are now making more. Moody’s reports that whoever controls the economy wins the election. IMF goofs and lets everyone know it was their policies that cause the economic problems. —
PLUS: House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings has died. Senate Republicans preparing for #impeachment trial this year. U.S. secures Turkey ceasefire in northern Syria. Erdogan threw Trump letter in the garbage. UN may investigate war crimes by Turkey. Iran says Europe incapable of fulfilling its JCPOA commitments. Friedman says Jewish settlers will stay in ‘Deal of the Century’ peace plan. Jewish settlers incite violence in West Bank and Jerusalem. Papyrus scrolls at Museum of the Bible were stolen. School crossing guard is latest victim of ‘red flag’ laws. Drug-addicted sex trafficking victim commits suicide. Abortion survivors push back against Big Abortion’s false claims. —
The Panic Is Real, Middle East Plan Perfectly Executed, 17, Coincidence
[CB] Up To Their Old Tricks, NP Exposed On The Economy
TruNews UNCENSORED Headlines – October 17, 2019
Elijah #Cummings 1951-2019
Headlines With a Voice
#finance #geopolitical #endtimes #shtf #economy #prepare #politics
NIET VERTAALD: Just In! Democrats Rocked After Bill Barr Makes Big Decision About Arrest Order, Watch This! - Video
Hup. Gaan we weer.
Friday, October 18,, John Rolls.
Friday, October 18,, John Rolls.
Wherever the dems go there is criminal envolvment–each democrat seat is a franchise, a money making opportunity as long as it’s selling out this Country to their advantage–no wonder they don’t want a wall, they need the drug revenue and they want to keep their voters stoned and happy, also stupid.
This is fine, but we want DC swamp rats. Specifically Clinton, Obama, Lynch, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Omar. Those first then every other person involved in any level in this attempted coup.
Time for the DemoRats to be charged with Hate crimes, Sedition, Grand Theft and TREASON. TRUMP 2020
Barr wake up clean the crooked Democrats out of our government America first!!!
You can bet your bottom dollar Obama had his hands all up in that and Hillary
Barr gets 10 points for going after people who broke the law in other countries. Good Job. But we are in need of justice in our own country. Barr and Durham spent tax payers money to travel to other countries to get to the bottom of the Ukraine hoax and we get the Turkey, Iranian money deal. Talk about a stahl , I ment to spell it like that. What is Barr waiting for? He gives us little crumbs to make us happy. I really don’t think he is a patriot. The rabbit hole goes real deep. Do something Barr and show us you are for justice. Letting Comey walk was a big mistake. It showed favor for dems. I am done with it !!!!.
WHY in the thunder don’t barr do his job in America instead of doing neighbor hood watch ????? we have all the demonrats here in America and most of them are crooks !!!!
He needs to arrest obama not people in other countries obama permitted it arrest him
It was all made possible by Obama, brennen, hrc, rice, and Jared. They are still scamming the American ppl.
The Big Lie That Barr Lied
The attorney general’s testimony was clearly accurate…
I originally thought this was too stupid to write about. But stupid is like the plague inside the Beltway — one person catches it and next thing you know there’s an outbreak at MSNBC and the speaker of the House is showing symptoms while her delirious minions tote ceramic chickens around Capitol Hill.
So I give you: the Bill Barr perjury allegation.
We are all entitled to our own opinions. But are we entitled to our own facts? Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s bon mot says no, but Washington makes you wonder. Like when spleen-venting about the supposedly outrageous, unbelievable, disgraceful invocation of the word “spy” to describe episodes of government spying is instantly followed by a New York Times story about how the spying — er, I mean, court-authorized electronic surveillance — coupled with the tasking of spies — er, undercover agents — green-lighted by a foreign spy — er, intelligence service — was more widespread than previously known.
If I were a cynic, I’d think people were trying to get out in front of some embarrassing revelations on the horizon. I might even be tempted to speculate that progressives were trotting out their “Destroy Ken Starr” template for Barr deployment (which, I suppose, means that 20 years from now we’ll be reading about what a straight-arrow Barr was compared to whomever Democrats are savaging at that point).
The claim that Barr gave false testimony is frivolous. That is why, at least initially, Democrats and their media echo chamber soft-pedaled it — with such dishonorable exceptions as Mazie Horono, the Hawaii Democrat who, somehow, is a United States senator. It’s tough to make the perjury argument without any false or even inaccurate statements — though my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano did give it the old college try. As recounted by The Hill, he twisted himself into a pretzel, observing — try to follow this — that the attorney general “probably misled” Congress and thus “he’s got a problem” . . . although this purported dissembling didn’t really seem to be, you know, an actual “lie” so . . . maybe it’s not a problem after all. Or something.
I assume that in his black-robe days, Judge Nap would have known better. When meritless perjury cases are thrown out of court, judges are often at pains to explain that the questioner who elicited the purportedly false testimony bears the burden of clarity; the terms of the question dictate the evaluation of the answer. In this instance, Barr’s April 9 testimony before the House Appropriations Committee was true and accurate; if a misimpression set in after, it is because the relevant questioning by Representative Charlie Crist (D., Fla.) has been ignored or distorted.
Moreover, because perjury is a serious felony allegation, judges and legal analysts never rely on a general, selectively couched description of the testimony — much less on the likes of Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s because-I-said-so refrain that Barr “lied to Congress” and “that’s a crime.” The testimony must be examined, with emphasis on the words that were used (the questions as well as the responses), and anything we can glean about the witness’s demeanor (stingy? dodgy? forthcoming?).
The mindless, no-need-to-check-the-record allegation against Barr goes like this: The AG testified on April 9 that he had no idea why Special Counsel Mueller was upset over the way Barr’s March 24 letter described Mueller’s report; but, in fact, Barr knew exactly why Mueller was upset because he had received the latter’s March 27 letter complaining about Barr’s missive.
Now, here is the exchange on which the perjury allegation is based, with my italics highlighting key portions:
CRIST: Reports have emerged recently, General, that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter . . . that it does not adequately or accurately necessarily portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?
BARR: No, I don’t. I think — I think . . . I suspect that they probably wanted more put out, but, in my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of, you know, being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also, you know, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once. So I was not interested in a summary of the report. . . . I felt that I should state the bottom line conclusions and I tried to use Special Counsel Mueller’s own language in doing that.
When we look at the actual words of this exchange, Barr’s testimony is clearly accurate. And I don’t mean accurate in the hyper-technical, Clintonesque “depends on what the definition of is is” sense. I mean straightforward, unguarded, and evincing a willingness to volunteer information beyond what the question sought.
Crist did not ask a general question about Mueller’s reaction to Barr’s letter; he asked a specific question about the reaction of Mueller’s “team” to the Barr letter’s description of “the report’s findings.” Regarding the March 24 letter’s rendering of this bottom line — namely, Russia meddled, Trump did not collude, and Mueller failed to resolve the obstruction question — Barr said he did not know what Mueller’s staff was complaining about.
Barr has known Mueller for nearly 30 years; when Mueller was the Criminal Division chief in the Bush 41 Justice Department, he reported to Barr, who was attorney general. It should come as no surprise, then, that Barr was not getting his information from Mueller’s staff; he was getting it from Mueller directly. Nor should it come as any surprise that, before releasing his March 24 letter to the public, Barr gave Mueller an opportunity to review it; nor that Mueller declined that opportunity — given that he knows Barr well, and knew Barr would not misrepresent the report (especially given that the report would soon be public).
Three days after Barr announced the report’s conclusions, Mueller sent his letter, undoubtedly written by his staff. Mueller could simply have called Barr on the phone, as he has done a million times; but the staff’s partisan Democrats wanted a letter, which makes for much better leak material. (The letter was, in fact, strategically leaked to the Washington Post Tuesday night, right before Barr’s Wednesday morning Senate testimony.) The day after receiving Mueller’s March 27 letter, Barr called Mueller and pointedly asked whether he was claiming that Barr’s March 24 letter articulating Mueller’s findings was inaccurate. Mueller responded that he was making no such claim — he was, instead, irritated by the press coverage of Barr’s letter. Mueller suggested the publication of additional information from the report, including the report’s own executive summaries, to explain more about why he decided not to resolve the obstruction issue. But he did not claim Barr had misrepresented his findings. (See Barr’s Senate testimony, starting at 39-minute mark.)
Again, Barr’s contact was with Mueller, not Mueller’s team. His exchanges with Mueller gave Barr no basis to know about any objection to his description of the report’s findings — from Mueller or anyone else. The fact that Mueller’s staff was leaking like a sieve to the Times, the Washington Post, and NBC News does not mean they were sharing with the attorney general what the Times described as “their simmering frustrations.”
That is what Barr said in answer to Crist’s question about the report’s findings. But to avoid the misimpression that he was parsing words deceptively, Barr volunteered his perception that Mueller’s staff wanted more information from the report to be publicized. That was consistent with what can be inferred from Barr’s phone call with Mueller on March 28. And it was not news: Crist’s questions were based on the aforementioned press accounts of leaks from Mueller’s staffers. They were irked at the bad press they were receiving over Mueller’s abdication on the question whether there was a prosecutable obstruction case, and they had groused that there was much more to their report than Barr’s letter conveyed. Of course, Barr never disputed this; as he repeatedly explained, he undertook to render the conclusions, not summarize the entire 448-page report.
Barr decided that his way of making disclosure — the findings followed three weeks later by the full report — was superior to the proposal of Mueller’s staff that their own summaries be released. You can disagree with Barr on that, but that’s not grounds for a perjury claim. And it raises a point Barr made in his Senate testimony: The regulations do not require any disclosure of the special counsel’s report (which is supposed to be a confidential Justice Department document, as is typical of Justice Department deliberations over whether to charge or decline to charge). The decision of what, if anything, to disclose, and how that should be done, is exclusively the attorney general’s, not the special counsel’s. Mueller’s job was to make a prosecutorial judgment — to charge or decline to charge obstruction. Mueller failed to do that. Since Mueller didn’t do his own job, isn’t it a bit presumptuous of his staff (through press leaks) to tell Barr how to do his?
Could what happened here be more obvious?
Mueller received fawning press for two years on the expectation that he would slay Trump. Then, on March 24, Democrats and the media learned not only that there was no collusion case (which was no surprise) but that Mueller had been derelict, failing to render a judgment on the only question he was arguably needed to resolve: Was there enough evidence to charge obstruction? Journalists proceeded to turn on their erstwhile hero. This sent him reeling, and it brought to full boil the anger of Mueller staffers, who wanted to charge Trump with obstruction based on the creative (i.e., wayward) theory they had been pursuing — namely, that a president can be indicted for obstruction based on the exercise of his constitutional prerogatives if prosecutors (including prosecutors who are active supporters of the president’s political opposition) decide he had corrupt intent. The staffers put their pique in a letter that could be leaked, and Mueller was sufficiently irked by the bad press that he signed it. And now Democrats are using the letter as the launch-pad for The Big Lie that Barr lied, calculating that if they say it enough times, and their media collaborators uncritically broadcast these declarations, no one will notice that they never actually refer to the transcript of what they claim is the false testimony.
Democrats are unnerved. Attorney General Barr is pursuing an inquiry into the Obama administration’s decision to conduct a foreign counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. The time is now, they figure, to reprise the Ken Starr treatment: the ad hominem withering of an accomplished, highly capable official — in this instance, one who is daring to press questions that would have been answered two years ago if an incumbent Republican administration had spied on — er, monitored — a Democratic presidential campaign.
Het is een vreselijk verneukt artikel, helemaal vol met reklame. Ik zal mn best doen om er het artikel tussenuit te kopiëren.
Friday, October 18, 2019, John Rolls
“The impeachment hoax
Friday, October 18, 2019, John Rolls
“The impeachment hoax
was initiated because of
to fully expose
That radioactive scandal
perpetrated by CrowdStrike
and the DNC leadership
is so dangerous to the
Democrat Party they
desperately started the
Now Trump really wants
that epic fraud investigated
because his presidency
depends upon it.”
— Intelligence Analyst & Former U.S. Military Officer
Truly, it doesn’t get anymore explosive than CROWDSTRIKEgate!
CONFIRMED: DNC paid the ‘Russian’ founder of CrowdStrike to hack its server so it could be blamed on Russia!
What, pray tell, could be more radioactive than the fact that CrowdStrike was specifically hired by the Democrat National Committee to plant fake evidence on the DNC servers. The cyber-perps deceitfully used Russian digital signatures in order to falsely blame Russia for the election hack that never even occurred … except that it did and it was actually conducted by CrowdStrike.
Wow … what a tangled web, indeed … and incredibly reckless scandal ! ! !
How did Deep State ever think they could get away with such a conspiratorial hoax?
Especially with President Trump using his Twitter account to expose the entire CIA-directed black operation?
This is exactly why they named the CrowdStrike-implemented psyop “Fancy Bear”.
The real perps behind the non-existent Russian hack wanted the American people to believe that CrowdStrike was a Russian bear-killing cybersecurity firm, which they aren’t.
Let’s be clear, the single best way for Trump to completely exonerate himself of even the slightest appearance of ‘Russian collusion’ is to prove that the Democrats falsified the evidence in the first place, WHICH THEY DID.
Why else would the DNC continually refuse to hand over their severs to the FBI so that the necessary forensic analysis could be conducted?!?!
Why else would the CEO of CrowdStrike — Dmitri Alperovitch — the “Russian-born American computer security industry executive … and co-founder and chief technology officer of CrowdStrike” name his bogus hacker-hunting operation “Fancy Bear” except to implicate the Kremlin for a hack that CrowdStrike pulled off?
Source – “Bear Hunting: History and Attribution of Russian Intelligence Operations” posted by CrowdStrike at slideshare.net
Yes, the back story to this unparalleled Democrat scandal is long and complicated, convoluted and full of intrigue. The following exposé breaks it all down in a way that every voter ought to understand before November 3, 2020.
Let’s face it: the Democrats will do anything to overturn the 2016 election result. These serial traitors to the Republic are so overwhelmed by Trump derangement syndrome that they will use any means required to take down Trump.
Well, CROWDSTRIKEgate shows just how far these hopelessly crazy communists will go.
When even a casual observer takes a closer look at all the evidence — scientific, circumstantial and anecdotal — it’s clear that the Democrats contrived an extraordinarily absurd and fictitious story to launch this scandal. In other words, “Fancy Bear” is really “Fanciful Bear”.
Whereas Dimity Alperovitch is really Russian by birth and ancestry, he was employed by the C.I.A and NSA to carry out espionage and counterespionage operations similar to their Russian hack op. And, here’s the indisputable timeline that proves it:
Which brings us to the true reasons behind IMPEACHMENTgate. See IMPEACHMENTgate: The Scandal Is Much Worse & Plot Much Thicker Than Anyone Knows
The Democrats know that Trump is not only on to them, he’s on a mission to expose the entire treasonous scandal.
What that really means is that it’s all-out war between Team Trump and Deep State. See: Deep State Attempts Yet Another Coup in Broad Daylight, Evidence Proves Treason and a Complex Criminal Conspiracy
This is it folks. The final battle in American politics is being played out between now and Election Day 2020.
What’s at stake is EVERYTHING … for both sides of the political aisle. It’s a winner take all proposition.
That’s why the Democrats concocted out of thin air the patently false allegations that were used to trigger the impeachment inquiry.
That’s why the fake UKRAINEgate was immediately blown up by the CIA’s Mockingbird Media and has not relented despite the lack of any evidence whatsoever. As follows:
CIA black op,
Deep State psyop,
or all 6?
Not only that, but seditious co-conspirators Pelosi and Schiff have even refused to present the so-called CIA ‘whistleblower’ whose ridiculous report was obviously fabricated to trigger the impeachment process. See SOFT COUP IN PROGRESS: Deep State Democrats Staged Fake ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint to Orchestrate Impeachment Hoax
KEY POINT: As always, there’s a much deeper and broader back story to CROWDSTRIKEgate. This particular video accurately connects so many dots it boggles the mind: Super-sleuth drops more radioactive intel in 22 minutes than the entire Alt Media does in a month!
Take a close look at this CrowdStrike piece taken from their website. Notice the heavy anti-Russian meming as well as the crucial dates. Everything points to a joint CIA-Madison Ave venture to further smear Russia.
Both Deep State and the entire Democrat Party are in extreme desperation mode.
Yes, they are facing the multifarious consequences associated with UKRAINEgate, BIDENgate, IMPEACHMENTgate and WHISTLEBLOWERgate, but it’s really CROWDSTRIKEgate that has the highly explosive potential to destroy the thoroughly corrupt and criminal Democrat Party forever.
The stark reality is that, once the CrowdStrike crime wave is disclosed to the American people, the Democrats are history—FOR REAL!
This is precisely why Deep State has put the craziest of all the crazies — Schiff, Pelosi, Nadler, Schumer, Newsom, DeBlasio, etc. in charge of their insane asylum at this pivotal point during their historic crash and burn. These bad actors (very bad by the looks of Shifty Schiff in every interview) were specifically chosen because of how profoundly compromised each of them is.
Just how compromised?
This compromised: PEDOGATE: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened for Deep State and the C.I.A.
Let’s also take a much closer look at Nasty Nancy’s well-hidden history here: COUP-IN-PROGRESS: Pelosi, the Mafia and the Black Nobility.
Bottom Line: This rapidly intensifying 3rd Millennium “War of the Titans” is gonna get hot—hotter, in fact, than either the Civil War or American Revolution.
Therefore, the best thing the Patriot Movement can do is to disseminate this incriminating information so that the body politic is totally saturated with it. The more folks who are informed, the greater the likelihood that the collective consciousness will expand sufficiently to prevent a national cataclysm. Wide circulation of this critical material can de-escalate this decisive conflict as much as anything.
A LOT of prayer for the protection and focused intention for the continuity of the American Republic would greatly help as well.
State of the Nation
October 17, 2019
October 17, 2019